Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → f(f(x, a), x)

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → f(f(x, a), x)

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [19] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → f(f(x, a), x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(x0, f(f(f(a, a), a), a))


Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(f(x, a), x)
F(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(x, a)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → f(f(x, a), x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(x0, f(f(f(a, a), a), a))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(f(x, a), x)
F(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(x, a)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → f(f(x, a), x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(x0, f(f(f(a, a), a), a))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(f(x, a), x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → f(f(x, a), x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(x0, f(f(f(a, a), a), a))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ UsableRulesProof
                ↳ QDP
                  ↳ Instantiation

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(f(x, a), x)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(x0, f(f(f(a, a), a), a))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [15] the rule F(x, f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(f(x, a), x) we obtained the following new rules:

F(f(f(f(f(a, a), a), a), a), f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(f(f(f(f(f(a, a), a), a), a), a), f(f(f(f(a, a), a), a), a))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ UsableRulesProof
                ↳ QDP
                  ↳ Instantiation
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(f(f(f(f(a, a), a), a), a), f(f(f(a, a), a), a)) → F(f(f(f(f(f(a, a), a), a), a), a), f(f(f(f(a, a), a), a), a))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(x0, f(f(f(a, a), a), a))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.